SaaS content marketing after the floor moved
Generic explainer content stopped working, and the reason is supply rather than any algorithm change. What replaces it, and how to get things out of your engineers' heads efficiently.
Jul 7, 2026
Service
Strategy, briefs, writing, and refresh cycles for software companies. Written by people who have sat in a QBR and had to explain what the content did.
The problem
Anything a language model can produce in nine seconds no longer ranks, because there is an unlimited supply of it and search engines have adjusted. The floor for "useful" moved up sharply, and it moved up fastest in B2B where the reader is an expert evaluating a serious purchase.
What still works is content carrying something a model cannot synthesise: your customer data, your engineers' opinions, a real implementation story, a number nobody else has published.
So our production process is built around extraction — getting things out of your team's heads — rather than around word count.
You probably recognise
What you get
A quarter of planned pieces, each with its search intent, target cluster, internal-link role, and the specific business outcome it exists to produce.
SERP analysis, required subtopics, the angle, the sources, the internal links, the CTA, and what to leave out. Ten pages, not one.
We run recorded interviews with your engineers, AEs, and customers, then build content around the parts nobody else could have written.
Writers with real B2B backgrounds, a technical edit, and a fact-check pass. Every claim gets a source.
Quarterly review of every URL: refresh, consolidate, redirect, or delete. This is where a large share of the gains come from and almost nobody does it.
Each piece ships with a LinkedIn angle, a newsletter blurb, and a sales enablement note so it does not just sit there.
How we run it
Same order every time, because the steps depend on each other. Skipping ahead is the most common reason these programs underperform.
Every URL classified by performance and intent. Usually a third of the library should be merged or removed before anything new is written.
Pillar pages, supporting articles, and the internal-link map that connects them to commercial pages.
The brief is where SEO happens. Writers should be writing, not researching SERPs.
SME interview, draft, technical edit, fact-check, publish.
Rankings, assisted conversions, and sales usage per URL. Pieces that miss get diagnosed, not quietly forgotten.
A piece published 14 months ago is a liability or an asset depending entirely on whether anyone maintains it.
Questions
Related reading
Generic explainer content stopped working, and the reason is supply rather than any algorithm change. What replaces it, and how to get things out of your engineers' heads efficiently.
Jul 7, 2026
A keyword and a word count is not a brief. What goes in one that lets a writer produce something rankable and specific, and the fields most teams are missing.
May 5, 2026
Most SaaS blogs are a publishing habit rather than an asset. What changes when every post has a stated job, and what a quarterly prune actually looks like.
May 26, 2026
No cost, no call required first
Send a URL. Four working days later you get a recorded walkthrough of what is holding the site back and a plan for the next two quarters.
Get my free teardown